Absolutely delusional link Matthew. Have you ever heard the saiyng Lies, damn lies, and statistics? The lie you’re using is called statistics. You can use any statistic you want to make a case for your arguments, and you cherry-picked a couple that were convenient for you. Tiger might win 18 Majors. He might win 20. But your justification for him winning 25+ is on the ridiculous side. You’re also conveniently discarding one statistic that is more important than you’re leading on 0 Majors in 4 years. He won 14 of them in 11, and now he hasn’t won in 4. He will win again maybe even this Sunday. But he will not win 11 more championships.
Absolutely delusional link Matthew. Have you ever heard the saiyng Lies, damn lies, and statistics? The lie you’re using is called statistics. You can use any statistic you want to make a case for your arguments, and you cherry-picked a couple that were convenient for you. Tiger might win 18 Majors. He might win 20. But your justification for him winning 25+ is on the ridiculous side. You’re also conveniently discarding one statistic that is more important than you’re leading on 0 Majors in 4 years. He won 14 of them in 11, and now he hasn’t won in 4. He will win again maybe even this Sunday. But he will not win 11 more championships.